欢迎来到星沙英语网

GRE 考试|GRE作文基础知识和进阶二十四

来源:www.pnswa.com 2025-01-28
(病历文)

In this argument, the arguer recommends us to use Adams, one of the two leading real estate firms in our town, to sell our homes if you want to instead of Fitch, the other leading one. To justify1 his conclusion, the arguer provides the clear evidence that Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast to the number 25 of Fitch, and even many of which are only part-time. In addition, he cited the fresh statistics of revenues of both Adams and Fitch, which respectively are $168,000 and $144,000. To make it more conceivable, the arguer even lists out a self-experienced case to exhibit the superior sell speed of Adams to Fitch. Although all the evidences above seem reasonable, a careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless it is.

In the first place, the arguer unfairly assumes Adams' service is better than Fitch's with the assumption that more agents, more satisfaction. The 40 agents in Adams might be poorly trained and unqualified with an extremely low work efficiency, thus enlarging the number of the agents is the only feasible compensation. While Fitch's 25 agents may be well trained and be rich in experience, although many of them work only part-time, under the present work condition it is enough. And also the quality of the service can't be oversimplified to only a factor of the number of employees, which, in our common sense, has no necessary correlation2. It is some other things should be taken into consideration, such as social reputation, the feedbacks of customers and the company's culture and spiritual, to avoid making the assertion too unwarranted.

In the second place, the statistics offered by the arguer can't elucidate3 anything. It seems true that Adams' achievement is greater than Fitch's through the comparison of revenues, but the data itself is too vague to be informative4. Taking into account the service charge, which can't be omitted in this case, we absolutely have adequate reasons to doubt the charge from Adams is far larger than Fitch, which eventually leads to such a gap. Another possibility of the result is contributing to the types of house they are entrusted5 to sell, since no evidence showed that Adams can afford to sell the lower-price estates while Fitch can assume the opposite ones, thus the phenomenon arises.

Last but not least, in short of legitimacy6 is that Fitch really sells homes slower than Adams does. According to the arguer's narrative7, he entrusted his home to Fitch ten years ago when the balance of offer-request heavily outweighed8 the left side and Fitch selling it in more than four months is nothing but a miracle. Adams, instead, sold his another home in one month last year during which the request for house might be booming as a result of influx9 of the foreign immigrants. Under this circumstance, Adams' success, however, is merely ordinary. Besides, the two houses sold out no doubt have natural differences, which tightly related to the smooth process of selling, such as location, structure, areas, and materials. The arguer thus makes so hasty a generalization10 regardless of these crucial points.

As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned in lack of some indispensable evidence. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would demonstrate that the superior quality of Adams' agents and the relatively11 lower charge comparable to Fitch's. Additionally, more details should be evinced, concerning the actual estate situation in those periods of time and fundamental instructions of the two sold houses, to rule out the above-mentioned possibilities. (587 words)

点评:该范本充斥着上面讨论的各种问题,仅开头就131字,加上结尾超越200字,已经远远超越正文1/3篇幅,是不可取的。很多模式句型充斥,结尾老套,不值得学习借鉴。另外不少考生关心如此一来字数就不合需要。ETS从来没对作文字数有需要,尽管网上时尚说法觉得阅卷者将字数列为打分项目之一,但在ETS公布的评分标准中是觅不着踪迹的,况且ETS极讲究科学性,不会以貌取人,但求以理服人,这

从他考试的设计可以看出来。所以正常的ARGUMENT作文可以在350500字之间,而ISSUE可在450600之间,这是按正常打字速度与思维速度指定的规范。不少网上作文包含我这里的某些范本都有远远超越500,600字的,极少是在真的全封闭作业下,45分钟或30分钟内完成的,在考试时间内,按上述标准的字数作文拿满分是绰绰有余的,事实说明所有,我的很多战友,包含前面提及的Violet,一直都是靠5步一杀,3步一枪,(500字左右ISSUE,300字左右ARGUMENT),在4,6级词语范围内稳拿5分6分,可见一斑。不相信的考生应该自己在PP2、PP3的作文模考中亲身体验,我会在最后推荐大伙一个行之有效的迅速训练作文速度和水平枪手作文速成练习法,大家这一辈称为替身杀手的人都是如此练出来的。


相关文章推荐

01

28

GRE 考试|GRE英语作文笔记(五)b

闪光句型:According to the title statement,while I agree thatI insist that/ it is natural thatIt is natural that people may d

01

28

GRE 考试|GRE作文基础知识和进阶十五

而结尾的任务与模式也基本有两条: (1)总结上文自己与话题的看法,勾勒全文论证概貌。(2)提出尚待履行的手段,建议等,并点描如此的后果。

01

28

GRE 考试|GRE范本:怎么样看待动物实验的利弊

[参考范本]Every year, millions of animals undergo painful suffering or death as a result of scientific research into the eff

01

28

GRE 考试|GRE作文点评:看法很与众不同的驳论文

Issue 31In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of our knowledge and

12

18

GRE 考试|GRE类反大全(6)b

footlooseattached无拘束的附着的forebearsdescendants祖先后代forerunneradherent先行者追随者forestallabet预先阻止唆使,怂勇formidablecomforting可怕的安慰的

12

18

GRE 考试|GRE类反大全(8)d

nexustrivial point重点琐碎的点niceimprecise精密的不精密的nocturnalhappen during daytime夜间发生的白天发生的noisomeattractively fragrant恶臭的具备迷人香

12

18

GRE 考试|GRE出国家公务员考试试写作:GRE出国家

Issue The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives.Sample EssayTo state that

12

18

GRE 考试|GRE出国家公务员考试试写作:GRE出国家

Issue The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives.Sample EssayTo state that

12

17

GRE 考试|GRE出国家公务员考试试写作:GRE出国家

看法陈述型作文/[题目]"当大家关注历史研究时,大家便成为故事讲述者。因为大家永远也不可能直接了解过去。

10

30

GRE 考试|GRE考试阅读特质剖析(一)

从What到How的认知过程剖析GRE考试阅读特质 1、引子大家都知道在General GRE考试中verbal部分的考试有三种题型:填空、类比反义和阅读。这三个部分的考试对于大家中国学生而言最难的部分就是阅读理解。